Back

Merry Voting

Warm greetings to you, Godville gods!

There are a lot of good news today. Let’s start with guild-related ones.

Guilds in Godville are self-sustaining amorphous substances and nobody really knows how they all work, which sometimes could be confusing. It’s time to bring a bit more order to this anarchy. From now on, the guild members will be able to elect a leader via newly created page. All prominent candidates can nominate themselves and fight for the mindshare of the fellow guildmates with mind-blowing campaigns in the Guild Council, forum topic, etc. It’s assumed that the leader will do things for the greater good of the guild, but in case he won’t, the guild members can always impeach him before the end of his term.

So, what a leader can do? In the ZPG spirit of Godville – probably not too much, but enough to bring a bit more order and fun to the guilds. A leader can set a daily topic for the Guild Council and setup a quick link to the guild’s forum topic to improve guild collaboration. For the high-ranked guilds the leaders will also be able to setup their own high-level guild rank and pick a known monster as a guild totem which will sure come in handy in the future. But enough words, let’s get to voting!

Meanwhile, the spirit of upcoming holidays is slowly but surely descending upon Godville. A pop-up settlement, also known as Laplandville, has opened their doors right next to the capital and began disrupting its business with bargain sales, overly generous traders, and extra efficient praying chapels. Heroes’ diaries are full of snow, and their sacks are full of gifts, while overcharged Holiday monsters are festively running around. Satan Clauses and Santa Clawses are also back in town and they look happy and quite tamable.

Happy holidays! Ho-ho-ho!

Posted at 12/24/14 12:50

Comments

The post has been archived. Comments are disabled.

Gravatar
Amadeus Goddammit 07.06.15 - 21:03

Potato

Gravatar
Buggen 02.06.15 - 17:41

Happy Happy Holidays! ♥♥♥

Gravatar
Komoodo- 22.04.15 - 05:59

Stop wasting your time on this game

Gravatar
Azzageddi 4 01.04.15 - 06:44

Sooooo…6 days left until the next election. Any hints on whether there will be any changes?

Gravatar
LexyZadie 30.03.15 - 00:21

B-)

Gravatar
R35 28.03.15 - 02:25

Hey guys can you help me here I am just new here in godville

Gravatar
Guido Burrito 4 06.03.15 - 09:00

I agree with the other comment about allowing more people to run and even vote. I am running only because there was no one else that even reads the guild page that ranks high enough. Now that I am running there are not enough people that rank high enough to get the needed votes. Fun idea but guild 207 is leaderless at this time

Gravatar
Robin0999 23.02.15 - 06:58

Hope everyone had a good holiday

Gravatar
Dormiin 22.02.15 - 15:30

Voting needs to be open to all members of the guild for the simple fact that there are not enough active higher ups in most guilds to vote a leader. This is my guild’s second week of the process because we don’t have enough active members. If everyone could vote, then there would also be more campaigning, (which would probably be extremely entertaining), and members would be more active in talking with their guildmates.

Gravatar
Pellia 22.01.15 - 00:38

I agree that there needs to be a tweak. My small guild has yet to get enough votes to actually get a leader, partly due to the ZPG nature of the game. Some members never participate in guild council chat, but are active prophets.

Gravatar
HiroGashi 20.01.15 - 21:10

.

Gravatar
Hell Kitty 18.01.15 - 07:51

We are a new guild with 28 members but nobody ranked is higher than Follower. I don’t think we should be seeing this:

Registration is open This week is a nomination week. Any guild member with a rank of hierarch or higher can nominate themselves to be a guild leader. Healthy debates in the Guild Council are welcomed.

This is a bug. Since we have no Hierarchs, nobody can nominate. Since we have no Cardinals (let alone 5 Cardinals), nobody can vote. Why confuse us with stuff that we can’t do anything about?

Gravatar
Bellatrixie The Strange 4 16.01.15 - 08:07

Thank you, devs, for adding a countdown clock so leaders know when to change the guild council topic! I love it!

Gravatar
Artsonian 5 12.01.15 - 20:37

I echo Syrocko and Brinjal on having that be the minimum votes cast, but then the majority of those wins. A group of us are doing a huge “Get Out the Vote” campaign in Blue Feather, but we also have a couple viable candidates in the running. Even if we get 200 people to vote, and they’re split between even just the top two candidates - we won’t hit our 111 votes needed. I know that’s how this first election is happening, and I know it can be done, and I’m hoping we can do it too. This is just for future elections.

I would much prefer allowing individual votes to matter, rather than some subgroup getting to decide “This is who you will back.” Even with the idea of having everyone shift their votes on the last day to the top candidate - that’s a lot more communication (“Thanks for voting, now go do it again”) that needs to be done with players who may or may not be that invested in the process.

Gravatar
YYZ 11.01.15 - 13:47

the good/ best thing about these new ‘guild enhancements, is that overall, whoever is ’in power’, will truly have little power at all. Like the Queen Mum, just a figurehead adored by everyone but welding little true power. (As it stands now) The worst thing about these new ‘guild enhancements’ is that it has broken the peace of GV, as a whole, and has also brought out the worst in a lot of us. For some guilds, it is applicable and beneficial. For some guilds, it is detrimental. A monumental move by the developers. Over time, it will evolve and ‘guild enhancements’ will continue to be added

Gravatar
Syrocko 4 10.01.15 - 19:40

I love it how the guild totem monster rewards the hero when s/he meets it.

Also, the more I think about it, the more I agree with Brinjal’s idea of making it so 35% of eligible members need to vote in total (I.e. The votes could be split in any way and they needn’t vote for one specific candidate) before a winner can be chosen. Maybe it could even be a little higher, like 40%. But changing the requirement this way would not have the advantage of not limiting competition and rival campaigns in large guilds the way the present system does, while ensuring that a winner could only be chosen if a lot of interest is shown in actually having one, and members can be persuaded to make the effort.

Gravatar
The God Of Monsters 10.01.15 - 07:27

Our guild held a vote on our Totem Monster but the monster chosen by popular vote was rejected by the game. There was no way for us to check in advance that the nominated monsters were acceptable.

The error message for setting for totem monster is actively user-hostile. In trying to set a monster, whether there is a typographical error or the monster is a “strong” monster or another guild has already chosen it, the same message is displayed. Good luck guessing what the actual problem is!

The fact that the error message is only displayed once you confirm that you want to use this monster is an additional issue.

Since the field is free text and “fat fingers” and “auto-carrot” are common problems, adding some context to the error would help, for example “Monster not found (check spelling)”, “Monster is not a regular monster”, or “Another guild has already chosen this monster”.

Gravatar
The God Of Monsters 10.01.15 - 07:15

I can confirm that five prophets are indeed required to set a High-level Title, even though the game made the option available to Order of the Monster Gods (presumably because we were top 20 in Popularity). It was not until I clicked “Set” that the game told me we needed 5 prophets. OK, I sort of expected that but it’s poor design.

The game should not offer this option if for any reason a guild does not currently qualify to set High-level Title. The message “A guild can set its own high-level guild rank if it has at least five prophets and it reaches Top-20 in the Popularity pantheon” should be displayed instead.

Gravatar
Avgp 09.01.15 - 12:07

The Dinner for One guild has decided not to elect a leader for two reasons:

1. Not enough active members to meet the threshold.

2. Our guild has been doing fine without one.

Thank you

Gravatar
Iduna 09.01.15 - 06:34

I am really impressed by all the creativity that is bursting forth! I know this hasn’t been an easy change for everybody but the results have been astounding. I just hope the devs can work out the kinks so that everyone can enjoy it!

Back

New Comment

Send
Markup Help
Back

Markup Help

Please be polite when talking to others..